Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

1949 DAILYLAW 3 (JK)

SHAHZADA BANO v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (HOME)

WP(C)/1949/2026 · 2026-08-14

Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Writ Petition (Civil)body1949

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 100 Supplementary List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1949/2026 CM(5287/2026) SHAHZADA BANO ….. Appellant/petitioner(s) Through: - Ms. Tabinda, Advocate V/S UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS ….. Respondent(s) Through: - Mr. Mohsin Qadri, Sr. AAG with Mr. Haris, AC CORAM: HON’BLE MS JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE (ORDER) 14.08.2026 01. By way of the present petition, the petitioner has sought three substantive reliefs, as contained in prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c) of the petition. However, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that the petitioner would confine the relief sought in the present petition to prayer clause (c), whereby a direction is sought upon the respondents to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner before the competent authority. 02. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had submitted a representation dated 28.07.2026 before respondent No. 2, raising the grievances as projected in the instant petition, but the said representation has not been considered or decided till date. Learned counsel further submits that, at this Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority, namely, the Senior Superintendent of Police, CID, Kashmir, to treat the instant petition as a representation and to take a decision thereupon within a reasonable period, strictly in accordance with law. 03. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and is not averse to disposal of the petition in the aforesaid terms. 04. In view of the submissions made at the Bar and having regard to the limited relief now sought by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claims and contentions raised by the petitioner, with a direction to the Senior Superintendent of Police, CID, Kashmir, to consider and decide the representation (writ petition) of the petitioner, in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned and speaking order, as expeditiously as possible and, in any event, within a period of two weeks from the date a copy of this order is served upon the said authority. 05. Disposed of along with connected CM(s). (MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI) JUDGE SRINAGAR 14.08.2026 “Mohammad Yasin Dar” Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document