RSA-1949- IN THE HIG 278 SDO (OP) U M/s Ujala Bh CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. concurrent j whereby the injunction fil 2. that the que jurisdiction Electricity A Bench of th Sub Division 3. and the suit ground of j take recours law. -2024 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o OP) Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Versus jala Bhatta M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Madhur Singh, Advocate fo I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The appellant-defendant is in rrent judgments and decrees rendered by the suit for declaration with cons filed by the respondent-plaintiff w At the very outset, learned cou e question of law involved in the p ction of the Civil Court is barred in icity Act, 2003, has since been decid of this Court in RSA-4181-2016, ti ivisional Officer and Another’ vide j In view of the above, the prese e suit filed by the respondent-plain d of jurisdiction. However, the respon ecourse to the appropriate remedy as ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1949-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.01.2026 Nigam Ltd. .… Appellant .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA cate for the appellant. is in second appeal against the ndered by both the District Courts consequential relief of permanent ntiff was decreed. d counsel for the appellant submits the present appeal as to whether red in view of Section 145 of the decided by the Hon’ble Division , titled as ‘Mahesh Kumar vs. vide judgment dated 14.05.2025. e present second appeal is allowed, plaintiff stands dismissed on the respondent-plaintiff is at liberty to dy as available, in accordance with the urts nent ther the sion vs. the y to with RISHU KATARIA 2026.01.28 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-1949- 4. made in the judicata in plaintiff. 5. 6. Registered P mentioned in 28.01.2026 rishu -2024 (O&M) -2- It is made clear that any ev in the impugned judgments and decr in any subsequent proceedings Pending application(s), if any, s Registry is directed to send a ered Post to respondent-plaintiff/M/s ned in the Memo of Parties. 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable ny evidence recorded/observations d decrees would not operate as res ings initiated by the respondent- any, shall stands disposed of. send a copy of this order through M/s Ujala Bhatta, at the address ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No ions es ugh ress RISHU KATARIA 2026.01.28 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.