CRM-M-1948 IN THE (210) ABHISHEK STATE OF P CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. Nagarik Surak anticipatory bai 109, 351(2) and and Section 2 Commissionera 2. petitioner wa investigation. 19481-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CRM- Date of HEK PRASHAD GUPTA Versus
OF PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Paras Jagga, Advocate for the Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Pu ****
HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) Through the instant petition under S Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘ ry bail in case FIR No.59 dated 03.03.2 (2) and 190 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhi tion 25 of Arms Act at Police S ionerate Ludhiana. Vide order dated 09.04.2026 p r was released on interim bail a ation. JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH -M-19481-2026 (O&M) ate of decision : 05.05.2026 ... Petitioner
...Respondent E MANISHA BATRA
for the petitioner G, Punjab under Section 482 of the Bharatiya hort ‘BNSS’), the petitioner seeks 3.03.2026 registered under Sections Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNS”) lice Station Moti Nagar, Police 026 passed by this Court, the bail and was directed to join AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.05 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-1948 3. petitioner has for custodial accused with occurrence. 4. to be a reason view of the fac given the natu attributed to h incarceration should not be commenting o petitioner on a allowed and th made absolute 482(2) of BNS 5. application, if 05.05.2026 Amit Sharma 19481-2026 (O&M) (2) Learned State counsel on in has joined the investigation on 18. odial interrogation to know about th with whom he was seen in the CCT In the considered opinion of this eason for denying benefit of anticipato the fact that the petitioner has already e nature of allegations as levelled aga d to him and the attendant facts and ation is not required. Even otherw ot be a replica of post-conviction sen ting on merits of case, it is observed r on anticipatory bail is made out. A and the order 09.04.2026 granting int solute, subject to compliance of cond f BNSS. Since the main petition has b ion, if any, is rendered infructuous. Whether speaking/reasoned:
   on instructions states that the 18.04.2026 and he is required bout the whereabouts of the co- e CCTV footage of the place of of this Court, this cannot be stated ticipatory bail to the petitioner. In lready joined the investigation and led against the petitioner, the part ts and circumstances, his pre-trial otherwise pre-trial incarceration ion sentencing. As such, without served that a case for release of out. Accordingly, the petition is ing interim bail to the petitioner is f conditions laid down in Section has been disposed of, pending (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE ned:- Yes/No

AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.05 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.