Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

1948 DAILYLAW 2 (DEL)

ZARNIGAR FATIMA & ANR. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, DELHI & ORS.

W.P.(CRL)/1948/2026 · 2026-07-08

Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav

Writ Petition (Criminal)body1948

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~103 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1948/2026 and CRL.M.A. 19492/2026 ZARNIGAR FATIMA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr M Sufian Siddiqui along with Mr Rakesh Bhugra Mr Niyazuddin and Mr M Mazhar Ahmed, Advocates. versus THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Singh, ASC with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Mr. Nitish Dhawan, Advocates. Mr. Hemant Kumar, Sub. Inspector, PS-Jafrabad, Delhi CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 08.07.2026 1. Without rendering into the correctness of the allegations or otherwise, Mr. Amol Singh, learned counsel who appears for the respondent-State, on instructions, submits that the Officer has no difficulty in recording the statement of the complainant who is the petitioner no.1 and, then, thereafter, to pass the order. He also submits that efforts were made to record the statement of the complainant, however, the complainant was not found available on two occasions. 2. The Court, thus, finds that without rendering into the merits of the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 16:01:27 issues raised herein, the interest of the justice would be served if the complainant is granted one more opportunity to appear before the concerned Officer for recording of her statement. 3. Accordingly, let her appear before the concerned Officer for recording of the statement on 13.07.2026 at 11:00 A. M.. 4. If the concerned Officer finds it appropriate to enquire into the other aspect, he shall be at liberty to do the needful. 5. In any case, the Officer concerned shall pass an appropriate communication to the petitioner intimating the outcome of his inquiry. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the petition sands disposed of. 7. If the grievance of the petitioner is not mitigated, he shall be at liberty to do the needful. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JULY 8, 2026 aks This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 16:01:27