Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010142812026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1948/2026 RAKIBUL ISLAM AND 2 ORS. S/O-SORHAB ALI 2: SIRAJUL ISLAM S/O-SORHAB ALI 3: SMTI RAHITAN NESSA W/O-SORHAB ALI ALL ARE VILL-MESERBHITA P.S-LAKHIPUR DIST-GOALPARA ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENT BY THE P.P, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M HOQUE, MD A ALI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 30.07.2026 Heard Mr. N. J. Dutta, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D. P. Goswami, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. Page No.# 2/3 2. By this application the petitioners have prayed for bail in connection with Lakhipur P.S. Case No. 88/2026, registered under Sections 61(2)/103(1) of BNS, 2023. 3. It is alleged by the informant of the case, who is the bother of the deceased that his sister got married to the petitioner No.1 and since the date of her marriage, petitioner No. 1 had demanded dowry and that the brother of the victim had also given some money to his bother-in-law. It was further alleged that on 03.06.2026, petitioner No. 1 called up informant asking to take the victim to which the brother replied that he cannot come and that half an hour later, petitioner No. 1 again called him saying that the victim had consumed poison. Thereafter, it is stated that the petitioner had taken the victim to the hospital and a duty doctor declared that the victim was brought dead. 4. In pursuant to the said information the petitioners were arrested on 05.06.2026 and since then they are behind the bars. The learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that although quarrel had taken place between the petitioners and the victim but the petitioners are no way responsible for the death of the victim. He further submits that petitioner Nos. 2 & 3 had no connection whatsoever, with the said offence. 5. Mr. D. P. Goswami, the learned APP for the State, on perusal of the Case Diary, submits that there was a quarrel between the victim and the petitioners and the same has been deposed by the witnesses who are the neighbors. However, he submits that the post mortem report has not been received. 6. Upon consideration of the submissions made by the learned counsels for the parties and on perusal of the case records, it is seen that the petitioners were arrested on 05.06.2026 and the statements of all the three petitioners Page No.# 3/3 were recorded by the Investigating Officer and also it is seen that it was the petitioner No.1 who had taken the victim to the hospital after informing the same to the brother of the victim. This Court therefore finds it fit that the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing of a bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with one local surety each to the satisfaction of the CJM, Goalpara on the following conditions: (i) They will appear before the Investigating Officer within 7 days from the order and would appear as and when called for. (ii) They will not influence the witnesses. (iii) They will not leave the place of residence without the permission of the learned Court. (iv) On violation of any of the conditions mentioned above and on non- appearance before the Investigating Officer even on 1 (one) day, the bail order will be amenable for cancellation by the Court mentioned above. 7. The Bail Application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant