ANURADHA BISWAKARMA v. NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION & ORS.
W.P.(C)/1946/2025 · 2026-01-15
Jasmeet Singh
Writ Petition (Civil)body1946
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1946 DAILYLAW 1 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1946 DAILYLAW 1 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~84 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1946/2025 & CM APPL. 9082/2025, CM APPL. 72490/2025 ANURADHA BISWAKARMA .....Petitioner Through: Adv. Yoothica Pallavi, Adv. Aditya Kumar, Adv. Anuradha Biswakarma versus NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. T. Singhdev (Adv), Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty (Adv), Mr. Bhanu Gulati (Adv), Mr. Tanishq Srivastava (Adv), Mr. Vedant Sood (Adv), Ms. Yamini Singh (Adv), Ms. Ramanpreet Kaur (Adv) for R1 Mr Siddharth Garg (Adv), Mr. Himanshu Chaubey (Adv), Mr. Siddharth Garg (Adv), Miss Lihzu Shiney Konyak (Adv), Mr Srajan Yadav (Adv), Miss Trisha Garimala (Adv) for R3
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 15.01.2026
1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:-
“A. Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the decision of Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2 contained in an email dated 14.06.2024 (Annexure P-1) sent by Respondent No.1; and B. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any Writ, Order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent No. 1- NMC and Respondent No.2 (EMRB) to issue eligibility certificate to the petitioner; and C. Issue a writ of mandamus or any writ, order or This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/01/2026 at 13:36:40
direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent No.3 to allow the petitioner to appear in FMGE to be conducted in June-July, 2025;”
2. In the present case, admittedly, the petitioner has not studied Physics in her Class-XI and XII at Singapore.
3. Ms. Pallavi, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner possesses the certificate from the Association of India University which should be sufficient enough requirement to appear for the FMGE.
4. However, without prejudice to her rights and contentions, the petitioner seeks to pursue Class-XI and XII Physics as an additional subject and thereafter apply for FMGE.
5. The same would constitute a fresh cause of action as and when it arises.
6. Without commenting on the merits of the present petition, the same is
disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as above.
7. It is further clarified that the Court has not examined the merits of the petition as well as the issue of eligibility of the petitioner.
8. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
JASMEET SINGH, J JANUARY 15, 2026 / (MS) This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/01/2026 at 13:36:40