BIKASH CHANDRA NAYAK @ BALARAM MOHANTY v. STATE OF ODISHA
ABLAPL/1944/2025 · 2026-01-07
V Narasingh
body1944
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1944 DAILYLAW 3 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1944 DAILYLAW 3 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.1944 of 2025
1. Bikash Chandra Nayak @ Balaram Mohanty
2. Raghunath Dash
3. SK. Isaq @ Isak
…. Petitioners
Mr. S. Dash, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Mr. S.K. Lenka, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Order No.
ORDER 07.01.2026
02.
1. Heard learned counsels for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
2. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.T. Case No.222 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned JMFC, Chandikhole, arising out of Dhramasala P.S. Case No.72 of 2025 for commission of alleged offences under Section 115(2)/ 126(2)/ 296/ 3(5) and 351(3) of BNS.
3. During the course of submission learned counsel for the Petitioners, on instruction, submits that in the meanwhile the Investigating Agency
has taken recourse to the provision contained under Section 35(3) of BNSS, as such, there is no apprehension of arrest.
4. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge Soumya Designation: Jr. Stenographer