Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

1944 DAILYLAW 2 (ORI)

RAJILLA SWAMI @ RAJILA v. STATE OF ODISHA

BLAPL/1944/2026 · 2026-04-22

Gourishankar Satapathy

body1944

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.1944 of 2026 Rajilla Swami @ Rajila … Petitioner Mr. R.C. Maharana, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. R.B. Mishra, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL) : 22.04.2026 01. 1. This is an application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with CDA-2 P.S. Case No.111 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. Case No. 340 of 2025 pending in the file of learned 3rd Addl. Sessions Judge, Cuttack for commission of offences punishable U/Ss. 309(4)/3(5) of BNS, on the main allegation of forcibly obtaining the gold ring of the informant by putting him in fear of injury and death. 2. Heard, Mr. Ramesh Chandra Maharana, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R.B. Mishra, learned Addl. PP in the matter and perused the record. 3. After having considered the rival submissions upon perusal of record, the FIR appears to have been registered against unknown persons, but the petitioner has not been put to TI parade for his identification, however, the petitioner is in custody since 18.08.2025 in connection with this case. Besides, the golden ring has already been recovered. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged against the petitioner vis-à-vis the accusations sought to be brought against him and regard being had to the materials so placed on record and taking into account the inherent right of the accused to be presumed innocent until proven guilty at the trial, this Court without expressing any view on merit, admits the petitioner to bail. 4. Hence, the bail application of the Petitioner stands allowed and the Petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty- five Thousand) only with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it with following condition:- (i) the petitioner shall report attendance before the jurisdictional Police Station once in a fortnight preferably on a 2nd Sunday in each month in between 10 A.M. to 12 Noon for three(03) months from the actual date of release from the custody. 5. The I.I.C. of Jurisdictional Police Station shall not detain the petitioner unnecessarily after recording his attendance beyond the time as stipulated. 6. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e-mail for reference. (G. Satapathy) Judge S.Sasmal Designation: Jr. Stenographer