IN T 235 Shiv Kuma Kuldeep Si CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU the concurre by the plain both the Co settled betw present app withdrawal April 22, 20 Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Regular Second Appeal No.1944 Date of decision :-22.04.2026 Kumar Versus Singh AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Nikhil Sheoran, Advocate fo I GUPTA J. (Oral) The defendant/appellant has file ncurrent findings of the learned Courts e plaintiff/respondent for mandatory inju he Courts below. Learned counsel for the parties tween the parties and they have the nt appeal. Accordingly, learned counse rawal of the present appeal. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, s , 2026 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH o.1944 of 2019 (O & M) …..Appellant …..Respondent NIDHI GUPTA vocate cate for the respondent. as filed the present appeal against ourts below whereby the suit filed ry injunction has been dismissed by arties ad idem that the matter stands ve the instructions to withdraw the counsel for the appellant prays for any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.24 17.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document