$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1944/2026 SHAHZAD ALI IDRISI .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Shankar Parashar, Adv. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS .....Respondent Through: Mr.Sumit K Batra, Adv for R-1 & 2. Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr.Adv. Ms.Shobhana Takiar, S.C. with Mr.Kuljeet Singh, Adv for DDA. Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Mohd. Amanullah, Mr.Misbah Bin Tariq, Ms.Asmita, Ms.Suphia Haque, Ms.Vibhuti Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA O R D E R % 11.02.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. On being pointed out that for seeking cancellation of a sanctioned plan, the petitioner has got an alternative statutory remedy under Section 347(B) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail remedy as prescribed under Section 347(B) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/02/2026 at 11:22:33 3. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ TEJAS KARIA, J FEBRUARY 11, 2026 S.Rawat This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/02/2026 at 11:22:33