IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.1940 of 2026 Decided on 25th February 2026 Kalpana Sharma …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Issue notice. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, learned Assistant Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. The contention of the petitioner is that she has been serving in the present place of posting for more than 11 years, now she be posted at some other place. Let an appropriate call be taken on the representation of the petitioner by the Authority within six weeks from today. The element of academic session can be taken into consideration by the Authority while deciding the representation. 2 3. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge February 25, 2026 (Vinod)