Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

1937 DAILYLAW 462 (MAD)

A.Senthil Nathan v. The Commissioner of Police,

WP Crl./1937/2026 · 2026-08-06

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Writ Petition (Criminal)body1937

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP Crl. No. 1937 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN WP Crl. No. 1937 of 2026 A.Senthil Nathan ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai - 600 007. 2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, O/o.Deputy Commissioner of Police, Koyambedu, Chennai. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, O/o.Assistant Commissioner of Police, Vadapalani, Chennai. 4. The Inspector of Police Virugambakkam Police Station, Chennai. 5. Ishwarya 6. Nagaraj ..Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition (Criminal) filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent 1 to 4 to consider petitioner’s representation dated 08.07.2026 and take action against the respondent 5 and 6 and thus render justice. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 1937 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner: Mr.S.Ramesh For Respondents: Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) for R1 to R4 ORDER This Writ Petition (Criminal) has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 4 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 08.07.2026 and take appropriate action against the respondents 5 and 6. 2. On instructions, the learned Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 submitted that, so far, the complaint lodged by the petitioner has not been received by the respondents 1 to 4 herein. It seems that there is a matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and the respondents 5 and 6 and that the petitioner has lodged the complaint through post. 3. In view of the above, the petitioner is at liberty to lodge a fresh complaint before the fourth respondent in person. On receipt of such complaint, the fourth respondent is directed to conduct an enquiry, after issuing notice to the petitioner and the respondents 5 and 6, and dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the complaint. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 1937 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4. With the above direction, this Writ Petition (Criminal) stands disposed of. No costs. 06-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No LPP To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai - 600 007. 2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, O/o.Deputy Commissioner of Police, Koyambedu, Chennai. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, O/o.Assistant Commissioner of Police, Vadapalani, Chennai. 4. The Inspector of Police Virugambakkam Police Station, Chennai. 5. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 1937 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN J. LPP WP Crl. No. 1937 of 2026 06-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis