Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010142592026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1937/2026 SRI BIBEK DAS S/O. SRI AMOL DAS, R/O. PURANI ALIMUR, P.O. PANCHMILE, P.S. TEZPUR, DISTRICT SONITPUR, ASSAM, PIN CODE 784025 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B CHOWDHURY, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER 28.07.2026 1. Heard Mr. B. Chowdhury, learned counsel appearing for the accused petitioner as well as Mr. D. P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent. 2. By this petition under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the accused-petitioner, namely, Bibek Das, praying for grant of bail in connection Page No.# 2/3 with Chariduar P.S. Case No.87/2026 (in GR Case No. 856/2026) registered under Section 87 of BNS Act. 3. The FIR on the basis of which the petitioner has been arrayed as an accused person and was arrested was lodged by the father of the victim stating inter alia that on 23.05.2026 his minor daughter was missing from her house and upon inquiry made it was found that the petitioner had taken her daughter and when the petitioner’s family was contacted the family members returned the daughter of the informant back to his house. It was further alleged in the FIR that on a subsequent occasions the informant found the petitioner speaking to her daughter near the market and upon seeing the father of the victim the petitioner was stated to have fled away with the daughter of the informant leaving his motorcycle behind. Upon receipt of the said FIR, police registered the case as stated above. 4. Learned Additional Public prosecutor submits that charge-sheet has been submitted in the instant case. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner however submits that the instant case relates to a relationship between the petitioner and the victim and that the victim went to the house of the petitioner on her own volition and it was the family of the petitioner who had to return her back and it was not once but several times. 6. Upon considering the submissions made by the learned counsel and on perusal of the documents placed in this particular case and more so due to the fact that the petitioner was incarcerated for a period of 24 days in the jail in connection with the offence at hand, this court finds it fit that the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing of a bail bond of Rs.20,000/- with one local security of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM Tezpur, Page No.# 3/3 Sonitpur under the following conditions that the petitioner: (i) will appear before the trial court as and when called for. (ii) will not tamper with the evidence or influence the witnesses connected in the case. (iii) He will not leave his residence without the permission of the trial court. 7. Accordingly, this bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant