1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. 903 WRIT PETITION NO. 1934 OF 2019 Datta Baswantrao Patil ..Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ..Respondents ….. Ms. A. N. Ansari, Advocate for the Petitioner Shri. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for the State. ….. CORAM : N. B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, JJ. Dated : MARCH 18, 2026 PER COURT :- . It is the grievance of the Petitioner that, Revision No.708/2015 has still not been decided by Respondent No.1. If it is so, it is really sorry state of affairs that in spite of 11 years, still the revision is not yet decided. 2. If the Revision is not already decided, Respondent No.1 to decide the same within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of writ of this order, after giving opportunity of hearing to the concerned parties. Petitioner shall be issued notice of hearing within two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of writ of this order. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.) (N. B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) GGP