State of H.P. & Ors. Vs. Mool Chand & Anr. CMP(M) No. 1930/2025 05.01.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for the applicants/appellants. Mr. Vijay Arora, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Kumar and Mr. Hitansh Raj, Advocates, for respondent No. 1. Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. CMP(M) No. 1930/2025 Reply to the application on behalf of respondent No. 1 has been filed, wherein, prayer for dismissal of the same has been made. No reply to the application is intended to be filed on behalf of respondent No. 2. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of Superintending Engineer, 6th Circle, HPPWD, Kullu, this Court finds sufficient cause to condone the delay of 49 days’ that has occurred in filing the present appeal. Consequently, the application is allowed and delay of 49 days’ that has occurred in filing the present appeal, is condoned. The application stands disposed of. RFA No. 2026 Appeal be registered. ...2... Notice. Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Advocate, and Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar, Advocate, accept service of notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 & 2, respectively. As prayed, list for hearing on admission after ensuing winter vacations on 16.03.2026. In the meantime, copy of grounds of appeal be also supplied to learned counsel for the respondents. Call for the records. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 5th January, 2026 (raman)