Shiv Prakash vs. State of H.P and others Ex. Petition 1927 of 2025 11.03.2026 Present: Mr.Arvind Negi, Advocate for the petitioner/applicant. Mr.Sikander Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents. CMP No.2578 of 2026 By way of present application, the petitioner has prayed for revival of the execution petition, which was disposed of on 16.10.2025. Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced copy of letter dated 10.03.2026 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Kinnaur at Reckong Peo. The same is taken on record. A perusal of order dated 10.03.2026 reveals that the benefits in terms of directions are being extended to the petitioner in obedience to judicial directions and administrative instructions and shall remain purely provisional, subject to final outcome of the pending Letters Patent Appeals and/or any other proceedings connected with Mohit Sharma’s case. In view of this, the application for revival of the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to grant consequential benefits, in terms of mandate contained in the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No.9151 of 2025, titled, Shiv Prakash vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, within eight weeks from today. In case the benefits as emanating from the judgment passed by this Court are not released in favour of the petitioner, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file fresh application, seeking revival of the execution petition. The application is accordingly disposed of. March 11, 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (naveen) Judge