Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010105212026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1927/2026 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 87, M. G. ROAD, FORT, MUMBAI 400001 AND ONE OF THE NORTH EASTERN REGIONAL OFFICE AT LACHIT NAGAR, G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI, ASSAM-781007 VERSUS HALIMA KHATUN3 ORS. W/O LATE RAMJAN ALI 2:REJIA KHATUN W/O LATE BORHAN ALI 3:MORIOM KHATUN D/O LATE RAMJAN ALI ALL ABOVE 1-3 ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE CHIRAKHOWA PART-IV P.ALOMGANJ P.S.- GAURIPUR DISTRICT-DHURBI ASSAM PIN-783339 NO.3 BEING MINOR IS REPRESENTED BY ABOVE NO. 1 AS NATURAL GUARDIAN 4:HASHEM ALI S/O LATE KAMAL UDDIN R/O VILLAGE POCHAR CHAR PART-I P.O.POCHAR CHAR P.S.- SOUTH SALMARA DISTRICT-DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 783127 .RESPONDENT/OWNER CUM DRIVER OF VEHICLE NO.AS-17- H-3099 M/CYCL Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : A BIYANI, MS. R DAS,MR. R K BHATRA Advocate for the Respondent : S I AKAND(R4), KAUSHIK JAIN(R4) Linked Case : RP(FAM.CT.)/0/0 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 87 M. G. ROAD FORT MUMBAI400001 AND ONE OF THE NORTH EASTERN REGIONAL OFFICE AT LACHIT NAGAR G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI ASSAM-781007 VERSUS HALIMA KHATUN W/O LATE RAMJAN ALI 2:REJIA KHATUN W/O LATE BORHAN ALI 3:MORIOM KHATUN D/O LATE RAMJAN ALI ALL ABOVE 1-3 ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE CHIRAKHOWA PART-IV P.ALOMGANJ P.S.- GAURIPUR DISTRICTDHURBI ASSAM PIN-783339 NO.3 BEING MINOR IS REPRESENTED BY ABOVE NO. 1 AS NATURAL GUARDIAN 4:HASHEM ALI S/O LATE KAMAL UDDIN R/O VILLAGE POCHAR CHAR PART-I P.O.POCHAR CHAR P.S.- SOUTH SALMARA DISTRICT-DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 783127 .RESPONDENT/OWNER CUM DRIVER OF VEHICLE NO.AS-17-H- Page No.# 3/3 3099 M/CYCLE ------------ Advocate for : Akanksha Biyani Advocate for : appearing for HALIMA KHATUN BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 02.09.2026 Heard Mr. P Hujuri, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. S I Akand, learned counsel representing the respondent no. 4. Seen the postal tracking report available with the record. Notice upon the respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 have already served. This application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condonation of delay of 139 days in preferring the connected appeal. Mr. Akand has submitted that he has no objection if the delay is condoned. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides. The delay has been satisfactorily explained. Accordingly, the delay is condoned. The connected MAC Appeal shall be registered and listed for admission hearing on 09.09.2026. The interlocutory application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant