CRA-S-1926-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 206 CRA-S-1926-2026 Decided on : 07.07.2026 Mannu Saini alias Yash . . . Appellant (s) Versus State of Haryana and another . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present : Mr. Prateek Rathee, Advocate and Mr. Shwas Bajaj, Advocate for the appellant(s). Mr. Pawan Kumar Garg, DAG Haryana **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) 1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellant, challenging the order dated 11.05.2026, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rewari, whereby concession of anticipatory bail to the appellant was dismissed, in case, FIR No.315, dated 17.10.2025, under sections 61, 351(3), 191(2), 191(3), 140(2), 133, 126, 109(1) of BNS (sections 120-B, 506, 147, 148, 364-A, 355, 339, 307 of IPC) (sections 61(2), 103(2), 111(2)(A), 253(A) of BNS, 2023 (corresponding to sections 120-B, 302 and 216 of IPC) and section 3(2)(v) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (added later on), registered at Police Station City Rewari, District Rewari. 2. On 29.05.2026, following order was passed: “ 1. xx xx xx xx 2. To substantiate the plea of false implication in the present case, learned REENA 2026.07.08 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRA-S-1926-2026 counsel for the appellant has referred to FIR No. 0314 dated 15.10.2025, registered under Sections 110, 115, 126, 190, 191(2) and 351(3) of the BNS, at Police Station City Rewari, wherein appellant – Mannu Saini alias Yash himself is the complainant, on account of the injuries caused at the hands of the complainant party, and due to the said injuries, appellant herein had remained hospitalised during the relevant period. 3. Learned counsel further submits that, possibly in retaliation to the incident dated 15.10.2025, complainant party may also have been assaulted; however, involvement of the appellant has been falsely introduced in the present case, i.e. FIR No. 0315 dated 17.10.2025 (impugned herein), which is stated to be a delayed and retaliatory version. Thus, learned counsel prays for grant of the concession of anticipatory bail to the appellant. 4. Notice of motion. 5. On advance notice, Mr. Pawan Kumar Jhanda, Sr. DAG, Haryana, puts in appearance on behalf of the respondent – State, and seeks some time to file status report in the matter. 6. Adjourned to 07.07.2026. 7. Let status report be filed by the State, on or before the next date of hearing.” 3. Today, at the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant submits that present appeal may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous as the appellant has been arrested. 4. Ordered accordingly. July 07, 2026 (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE reena Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No REENA 2026.07.08 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh