Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (102) RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) Reserved on: 18.03.2026 Pronounced on: 30.03.2026 Uploaded on: 06.04.2026
Avtar Singh (since deceased) through LRs. …Appellant Versus Balwinder Singh and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Argued by: Mr. Amit Jain, Senior Advocate with Ms. Nikita Sharma,Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Advocate for the respondent nos. 2 to 4. ***** SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 2 SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 3 SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 4 SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 5 SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 6 SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 7 A careful consideration of the judgments of the Courts below shows that the findings recorded therein are based on proper appreciation of the evid- ence on record. No material evidence has been ignored, nor has any misread- ing of evidence been demonstrated. The conclusions arrived at are reasonable SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 8 and do not suffer from perversity or illegality. In view of the foregoing discus- sion, it is evident that the appellant has failed to make out any case for inter- ference. The findings recorded by the Courts below are concurrent, well- reasoned and based on evidence, and no ground is made out to disturb the same.
17. Accordingly, the present Regular Second Appeal is dismissed and the judg- ments and decrees passed by the Courts below are affirmed.
18. Since the main appeal stands decided, all pending miscellaneous applic- ation(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 30.03.2026 Saurav Pathania (i) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
(ii) Whether reportable : Yes/No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document