Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

1924 DAILYLAW 3 (PNJ)

AVTAR SINGH v. BALWINDER SINGH

RSA/1924/1995 · 2026-03-30

Virinder Aggarwal

body1924

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (102) RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) Reserved on: 18.03.2026 Pronounced on: 30.03.2026 Uploaded on: 06.04.2026 Avtar Singh (since deceased) through LRs. …Appellant Versus Balwinder Singh and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Argued by: Mr. Amit Jain, Senior Advocate with Ms. Nikita Sharma,Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Advocate for the respondent nos. 2 to 4. ***** SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 2 SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 3 SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 4 SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 5 SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 6 SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 7 A careful consideration of the judgments of the Courts below shows that the findings recorded therein are based on proper appreciation of the evid- ence on record. No material evidence has been ignored, nor has any misread- ing of evidence been demonstrated. The conclusions arrived at are reasonable SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 8 and do not suffer from perversity or illegality. In view of the foregoing discus- sion, it is evident that the appellant has failed to make out any case for inter- ference. The findings recorded by the Courts below are concurrent, well- reasoned and based on evidence, and no ground is made out to disturb the same. 17. Accordingly, the present Regular Second Appeal is dismissed and the judg- ments and decrees passed by the Courts below are affirmed. 18.  Since the main appeal stands decided, all pending miscellaneous applic- ation(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 30.03.2026 Saurav Pathania (i) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable : Yes/No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document