Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010252892026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1924/2026 Between:
1. V.V.V. SATYANARAYANA,, S/O. V. NAKULUDU, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, BAR LICENSEE, (GAZETTE SI.NO.2B/EG/GK/02), R/O. 4-75, KALAVALAPALLI ROAD, CHAGALLU MANDALAM, UNAGATIA, WEST GODAVDRI, ANDHRA PRADESH-534 342.
...PETITIONER AND
1. MUKESH KUMAR MEENA IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI CHAMAKURI SRIDHAR IAS, THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE, EXCISE COMPLEX, R.S.NO.88-2B, SAI VIHAR APARTMENTS, POULTRY FARM ROAD, PRASADAMPADU (V), VIJAYAWADA-521108.
3. SMT Y SRILATHA, THE DISTRICT PROHIBITION AND EXCISE OFFICER/, LICENSING AUTHORITY, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents 1 to 3 herein for their wilful violation and deliberate disobedience to the orders dated 10.03.2026 passed by this Hon'ble Court in I.A.No.1 of 2026 in WP.No.6561 of 2026 by His
2
Lordships Hon'ble Sri Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao, under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. GINJUPALLI SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.1924 of 2026
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the orders of this Court have been complied with by the respondents. The said fact was not disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 15.06.2026 SJ
4
75 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Contempt Case No.1924 of 2026
15.06.2026 SSJJ