Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

1923 DAILYLAW 3 (PNJ)

ASHOK KUMAR v. NASIB SINGH AND ANR.

FAO/2342/2009 · 2026-04-27

Pankaj Jain

body1923

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[226-2] Ashok Kum Nasib Sing Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] modificatio Compensat [2] that the in commencin after the da [3] [4] appear bef employer a IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA FAO-2342 Date of De k Kumar versus b Singh and another HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Ashwani Bakshi, Advocat for the appellant. Mr. Sahej Mahajan, Advocate respondent No.2-Insurance Co **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) The present appeal has been p fication of the order passed by the Com pensation Act, 1923. The order passed by the Comm the interest on the compensation s encing from 30 days after the date the date of the award as ordered by the With the aforesaid modificatio Insofar as the issue of penalt ar before the Commissioner, who s oyer and determine the liability of pen T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 2342-2009 (O&M) of Decision : 27.04.2026 …Appellant ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN vocate ocate for ce Company. been preferred by the appellant seekin he Commissioner under the Employee Commissioner is modified to the exte tion shall be payable for the perio e date of the accident and not 30 day by the Commissioner. ation, the appeal stands disposed of penalty is concerned, the parties sha who shall issue show cause to th penalty in accordance with law. seeking ployees’ e extent period 30 days sed off. ies shall to the RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.04.30 18:49 I agree to specified portions of this document FAO-2342-2009 (O&M) -2- [5] The parties shall appear before the Commissioner on 06.07.2026. [6] All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed off. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 27.04.2026 ‘R. Sharma' Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.04.30 18:49 I agree to specified portions of this document