FAO NO.1921 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 229 KAMLA KAMLA KAMLA KAMLA Vs Vs Vs Vs SATBIR SINGH SATBIR SINGH SATBIR SINGH SATBIR SINGH CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Present: None for HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the dated 20.10.2016 passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Jhajjar, vide which application preferred at the instance of the appellant for setting aside the ex-parte judgment and decree dated 31.05.2012 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Jhajjar, stands A perusal of the records shows that no one is appearing on behalf the appellant for the last couple of hearings. In view of above pursuing the present appeal. The same stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Dismissed for non Pending application(s), if any shall stand disposed of. July July July July 00007777, 202 , 202 , 202 , 2026666 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable FAO NO.1921 of 2017 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH FAO FAO FAO FAO No. No. No. No.1921 1921 1921 1921 Date of Decision Date of Decision Date of Decision Date of Decision SATBIR SINGH SATBIR SINGH SATBIR SINGH SATBIR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ None for the appellant. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the dated 20.10.2016 passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Jhajjar, vide which application preferred at the instance of the appellant for setting aside judgment and decree dated 31.05.2012 passed by the learned nal District Judge, Jhajjar, stands dismissed. A perusal of the records shows that no one is appearing on behalf the appellant for the last couple of hearings. In view of above, it appears that the appellant is no more interested in present appeal. The same stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending application(s), if any shall stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH 1921 1921 1921 1921 of of of of 2017 2017 2017 2017 (O&M) (O&M) (O&M) (O&M) Date of Decision Date of Decision Date of Decision Date of Decision: : : : 07 07 07 07.0.0.0.07777.202 .202 .202 .2026666 ...... ...... ...... ......Appellant Appellant Appellant Appellant ....Respondent ....Respondent ....Respondent ....Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJAAAA By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the decision dated 20.10.2016 passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Jhajjar, vide which application preferred at the instance of the appellant for setting aside judgment and decree dated 31.05.2012 passed by the learned dismissed. A perusal of the records shows that no one is appearing on behalf the , it appears that the appellant is no more interested in present appeal. The same stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending application(s), if any shall stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 1 decision dated 20.10.2016 passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Jhajjar, vide which application preferred at the instance of the appellant for setting aside judgment and decree dated 31.05.2012 passed by the learned A perusal of the records shows that no one is appearing on behalf the , it appears that the appellant is no more interested in present appeal. The same stands dismissed for want of prosecution. MOHMED ATIK 2026.07.07 18:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment