SALIMUDDIN ABDUL MAJID KHAN v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
IA/2746/2026 · 2026-09-17
body1916
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1916 DAILYLAW 3 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1916 DAILYLAW 3 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
929-aba1916-26.doc vai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1916 OF 2026 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2746 OF 2026 Smt.Ratnamala P. Patil (Yenare) ...Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.Aditya Vijay Sawant for the Applicant in ABA No.1916 of 2026. Mr.Sandeep Singh for the Intervenor. Mr.Bapu V. Holambe Patil, APP for the Respondent – State. Mr.Shahaji Narale, API,Shil-Dighar Police Station is present in Court.
CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR
, J.
DATE : 17TH SEPTEMBER
, 2026.
P.C. :- INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2746 OF 2026
1. This is an application for intervention filed on behalf of the complainant.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned APP for respondent – State and learned counsel for accused. 1/2 VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Digitally signed by VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Date: 2026.09.17 19:14:39 +0530
929-aba1916-26.doc
3. Although, the application is opposed by learned counsel for accused, considering the fact that it is filed by the complainant at whose instance the FIR is registered, the intervention application is allowed. The name of the informant be added as respondent no.2 in the application for anticipatory bail.
4. Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of one week from today.
5. The interim application is allowed in aforesaid terms.
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1916 OF 2026
1. List the application for further consideration on 6th October,
2026. Interim protection granted earlier shall continue till next date.
(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) 2/2