COCP-1915-2026 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1915-2026 Date of decision: 27.07.2026 Jaipal @ Jaypal ...Pe!!oner Versus Sh. Sudhir Rajpal, IAS and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. Parth Goyal, Advocate for the pe!!oner. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G. Haryana. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) By way of this pe!!on filed under Sec!on 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Ar!cle 215 of the Cons!tu!on of India, the pe!!oner prays for ini!a!ng contempt proceedings against the respondents for willfully disobeying the order dated 21.08.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by this Court in CWP No.1941 of 2009 !tled as Jaipal and others vs. State of Haryana and others. 2. The opera!ve por!on of the order dated 21.08.2025 is as under:- “On being confronted with judgment dated 22.01.2025 passed in CWP No. 10071 of 2022, 'tled as "Sanjeev Kumar vs. State of Haryana and Others, learned State counsel submits that claim of the pe''oners would be considered as per aforesaid judgment. If any pe''oner has already been regularized as per policy of 2014, he would be treated as per observa'ons made by this Court in aforesaid judgment.” 3. It was brought to the no!ce of this Court on the previous date of hearing that an LPA had been filed by the respondent – State. 4. Today, learned State counsel has placed on record a copy of the order dated 23.04.2026 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in LPA- YOGESH MEHTA 2026.07.27 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-1915-2026 [2] 952-2026 !tled as The State of Haryana and others vs. Jaipal and others, which has been disposed of in light of the order passed in LPA-1810-2025 !tled as Aas Mohammad and others vs. State of Haryana and others. The opera!ve por!on of the order is as under:- “9. In that view of the ma0er, all the appeals are disposed of with a direc'on upon the State of Haryana/its Bodies/Corpora'on/Nigam to accord fresh considera'on to the claim of employees involved in this batch of cases by passing a speaking order in respect of their claim for regulariza'on within a period of six months. The judgment of the learned Single Judge under appeal stands modified in the light of the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Madan Singh (supra). Till an appropriate order in respect of claim of each of the employees is passed, status quo as exists today would be maintained. It goes without saying that the claim of regulariza'on based on policy of 2011 will also be accorded considera'on keeping in view the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Madan Singh (supra) and the order impugned in the present batch of appeals/writ pe''ons would not come in the way of fresh considera'on of the claim of employees for regulariza'on. 10. In order to facilitate a fresh considera'on of claim of the individual employee, we direct each employee to submit a comprehensive representa'on to the department along with a copy of this order within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of cer'fied copy of this order.” 5. In view of the aforesaid order of the Division Bench, counsel for the pe!!oner submits that he shall make the necessary representa!on so that the respondents can make compliance of the order and that at this stage, the present pe!!on may be disposed of. 6. In view of the aforesaid statement made by counsel for the pe!!oner and also in view of the order dated 23.04.2026 passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in LPA-952-2026, the present pe!!on stands disposed of. 27.07.2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) Yogesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No YOGESH MEHTA 2026.07.27 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document