Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

1915 DAILYLAW 4 (DEL)

SAMEER @WAJID v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

BAIL APPLN./1926/2026 · 2026-05-20

Manoj Jain

body1915

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

BAIL APPLN. 1915/2026 & BAIL APPLN. 1926/2026 1 $~2 & 71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1915/2026 & CRL.M.A. 15509/2026 SAMEER @WAJID .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Suresh Chandra Sati, Mr. Vinod Kumar, Mr. Satish Chand, Ms. Sakshi Bansal, Ms. Shweta, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP for the State with Nitin. 71 + BAIL APPLN. 1926/2026 & CRL.M.A. 15609/2026 SAMEER @WAJID .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Satish Chand, Ms. Sakshi Bansal, Ms. Shweta, Ms. Mariya Khatoon and Ms. Aarti, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for the State with SI Nitin. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN O R D E R % 20.05.2026 1. The applicant is in custody in two matters i.e. FIR No. 0243/2017 and FIR No.0245/2017 both of which are registered at P.S. Burari for commission of offences under Sections 302/120B/201/308/411/34 IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act, 1959. 2. He seeks interim bail for a period of 30 days as he is getting married on This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2026 at 12:10:01 BAIL APPLN. 1915/2026 & BAIL APPLN. 1926/2026 2 25th instant. 3. The status report has been filed and factum of the abovesaid marriage, being scheduled for 25.05.2026, has been duly verified. As per the report, the statements of various neighbours and Gram Pradhan have been recorded. 4. Both the FIRs are of the year 2017 and the applicant is in custody for around nine years. Both the cases are being tried together and, in the unfortunate incident in question, six precious lives were lost. 5. During course of the arguments, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that there is no mala fide intention and present application is not a ploy to come out of the jail. 6. After some arguments, he submitted that he would have no objection if the applicant is released on custody parole so that he can get married. 7. There does not seem to be any embargo in acceding to the abovesaid limited request. 8. In view of the above, both the abovesaid applications are disposed of with direction to Jail Superintendent to make requisite arrangements so that the applicant is taken to Village Samoli-Salempur, Daurala, Meerut where the wedding is scheduled on 25.05.2026. The period of the custody parole would be from 10:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., excluding the journey time. 9. Let requisite arrangements be accordingly made by the Superintendent Jail. 10. A copy of this order be sent to Jail Superintendent for information. MANOJ JAIN, J MAY 20, 2026/ss/pb This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2026 at 12:10:01