COCP-1912 IN THE HI 113 SG Enclave Nitesh Kuma CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of Division Be Phase-I Res Punjab and 2. respondents 1912-2026 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o clave Phase-I, Resident Welfare Socie Versus Kumar Jain M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Ms. Isha Janjua, Advocate for th Ms. Anu Chatrath, Senior Advo Mr. Ratik Chatrath Kapur, Advo for the respondents assisted by Mr. Khushpreet Singh, Estate O I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 24.12.2025 (An on Bench of this Court in CWP-3897 Resident Welfare Society (Regist and others’, whereby it was directed “xxx xxx 6. In view of the limited pr of with direction to the official decide the representation dated of the petitioners in accordanc opportunity of personal hearin affected parties, expeditiously, two months from the date of re order.” At the very outset, learned dents has pointed out that first and ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1912-2026 Date of Decision: 23.04.2026 Society (Regd.) and others .… Petitioners .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA e for the petitioners. r Advocate with r, Advocate ed by state Officer. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-8) passed by the 38972-2025 titled as ‘SG enclave egistered and others vs.State of rected as follows:- xxx d prayer, this petition is disposed icial respondents to consider and ated 31.07.2025 (Annexure P-17) dance with law after affording an aring to the petitioners and other ly, preferably within a period of of receipt of certified copy of this learned Senior Counsel for the t and foremost in pursuance of the ging the ve of ed nd 7) an er of is the the RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.24 13:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-1912 order dated upon the re 10.03.2026 Singh, Estat the spot raise un-authorize and Proper consideration disposed of. 3. aforesaid sub 4. 5. disposed of 6. 7. 23.04.2026 rishu 1912-2026 -2- dated 24.12.2025 (Annexure P-8), the the respondents along with copy 2026. It is further pointed out on ins , Estate Officer, that qua the un-autho ot raised by the constructors, they hav horized construction under the provis Property Regulation Act, 1995 ( eration. It is accordingly prayed that ed of. Learned counsel for the petition aid submission of learned Senior Coun Heard. In view of the afore-noted fact ed of, accordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable , the petitioner had served notice copy of the said order only on on instructions from Sh. Khuspreet authorized construction existing at have applied for compounding of provisions of the Punjab Apartment 995 (PAPRA), which is under d that the present petition may be etitioner is unable to controvert the r Counsel for the respondents. facts, the present petition stands any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No tice on reet at g of ent nder y be t the ands RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.24 13:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.