Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

1911 DAILYLAW 5 (BOM)

SHAHJADI MIRAJ SHAIKH @PAPA v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BA/1911/2026 · 2026-09-17

body1911

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SA_MANDAWGAD 907 BA 1911-26.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1911 OF 2026 Shahjadi Miraj Shaikh @Papa … Applicant V/S. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent Mr. Kamlesh M. Satre, for the Applicant. Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for Respondent–State. Mr.Amit Ghogare, API, ANC Worli Unit, present. CORAM: SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J. DATED : 17th SEPTEMBER, 2026 P.C. :- 1. Ms. Shinde, learned APP, on instructions of Mr. Ghogare, API, ANC Worli Unit, stated that the trial is part-heard and only two prosecution witnesses remained to be examined. She further stated that the trial will be completed within a period of three months from today. 2. In view thereof, learned counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the aforesaid Bail Application with liberty to renew the prayer for bail before this Court if the trial is not completed within the said period of three months. 3. Leave to withdraw is granted, with aforesaid liberty. 4. Application stands disposed of as withdrawn. 5. It is made clear that this Application is not heard on merits. 6. The Trial Court is requested to expedite the hearing of the remaining witnesses and endeavour to dispose of the case within three months. (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) PREETI HEERO JAYANI Digitally signed by PREETI HEERO JAYANI Date: 2026.09.19 11:35:23 +0530