RFA-2309 111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Dharamjit and others Harkishan Singh and others CORAM: Present: HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) laid to the decision dated Additional District Judge, Hoshiarpur, whereby application preferred under Section 92 1908 at the instance of appellants/ plaintiffs seeking permission to file suit for declaration, stands declined. 2. through the paper 3. prayer was made on behalf of the appellants which was declined by the Cour Further, it has also been established o 2309-1997 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** RFA Date of Decision: Dharamjit and others Versus Harkishan Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate for the appellants. None for the respondents. -.- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of filing the present appeal laid to the decision dated 14.08.1997 passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Hoshiarpur, whereby application preferred under Section 92 read with Section 151 at the instance of appellants/ plaintiffs seeking permission to file t for declaration, stands declined. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the paper-book. A perusal of the record shows that previously also, similar prayer was made on behalf of the appellants which was declined by the Court vide order dated 20.05.1995 passed in L Further, it has also been established o IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-2309-1997 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.02.2026 …….Appellants Versus ..….Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Naresh Kumar, Advocate None for the respondents. way of filing the present appeal, challenge has been 14.08.1997 passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Hoshiarpur, whereby application preferred read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, at the instance of appellants/ plaintiffs seeking permission to file I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone A perusal of the record shows that previously also, similar prayer was made on behalf of the appellants which was declined by t vide order dated 20.05.1995 passed in LTA-43 of 1994 Further, it has also been established on record that the present challenge has been 14.08.1997 passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Hoshiarpur, whereby application preferred ivil Procedure Code, at the instance of appellants/ plaintiffs seeking permission to file I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone A perusal of the record shows that previously also, similar prayer was made on behalf of the appellants which was declined by 3 of 1994. record that the present SANJAY GUPTA 2026.02.20 19:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RFA-2309 proceedings were initiated at the instance/ motivation of one Pritam Singh, who was already concerning 4. Court to establish that or substantive interest either in the Dera (Dera Singh, Hoshiarpur) or in any of its properties. 5. Additional District Judge, Hoshiarpur, being based on proper appreciation of pleadings and the material available on record, calls for no interfe merit, is thus, dismissed. 6. disposed of 16.02.2026 sanjay 2309-1997 (O&M) [2] proceedings were initiated at the instance/ motivation of one Pritam , who was already engaged in litigation with respondent No.1 concerning the management of Dera and also its properties. Furthermore, no material has been placed before this Court to establish that the appellants/ landowners or substantive interest either in the Dera (Dera Singh, Hoshiarpur) or in any of its properties. In view of the aforesaid, the order passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Hoshiarpur, being based on proper appreciation of pleadings and the material available on record, calls for no interference. Accordingly, the present appeal, being devoid of merit, is thus, dismissed. Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .02.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? proceedings were initiated at the instance/ motivation of one Pritam in litigation with respondent No.1 the management of Dera and also its properties. no material has been placed before this the appellants/ landowners possessed any real or substantive interest either in the Dera (Dera Gurudwara Bhai Dulla Singh, Hoshiarpur) or in any of its properties. In view of the aforesaid, the order passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Hoshiarpur, being based on proper appreciation of pleadings and the material available on record, calls rence. Accordingly, the present appeal, being devoid of Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Yes/No proceedings were initiated at the instance/ motivation of one Pritam in litigation with respondent No.1 no material has been placed before this any real Gurudwara Bhai Dulla In view of the aforesaid, the order passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Hoshiarpur, being based on proper appreciation of pleadings and the material available on record, calls rence. Accordingly, the present appeal, being devoid of Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand (HARKESH MANUJA) SANJAY GUPTA 2026.02.20 19:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document