Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No. 1906 of 2026
Tulikarani Behera & Anr.
..…... Petitioner (s) Mr. Biswaranjan Dalai, Adv.
-Versus-
State of Odisha & Anr.
……. Opposite Party (s) Mr. Debasish Nayak, AGA Mr. Samir Kumar Mishra, Sr. Adv. along with associate (for O.P.2)
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI
ORDER
02.07.2026
Order No.
01.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.
2. Heard.
3. The Petitioners have filed this CRLMC with a prayer to quash the criminal proceeding initiated against them in Balasore Sadar P.S. Case No.193 of 2026, corresponding to C.T. Case No.357 of 2026 pending before the learned J.M.F.C. (City), Balasore.
4. The prosecution allegation, in brief, is that the Petitioners received a sum of Rs.27,50,000/- from the informant towards the cost of a piece of land situated at Kuruda under Remuna Tahasil, bearing Khata No.196/1323, Plot No.578/1112, measuring Ac.0.05 Digitally Signed Signed by: LITARAM MURMU Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 02-Jul-2026 17:11:21 Signature Not Verified
decimals. It is further alleged that the informant subsequently came to know that no such land existed. When the informant questioned the Petitioner and her husband in this regard, they abused her in filthy language and threatened her. Hence, this case.
5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the materials available on record, this Court finds no ground, at this stage, to interfere with the proceeding arising out of Balasore Sadar P.S. Case No.193 of 2026, corresponding to C.T. Case No.357 of 2026, pending before the learned J.M.F.C. (City) Balasore, as the materials on record prima facie disclose the commission of the alleged offences. Accordingly, the application for quashing of the criminal proceeding stands rejected.
6. Accordingly, the CRLMC is dismissed.
7.
( Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi)
Judge
Murmu