HAFEEZA BANO v. STATE OF JK AND OTHERS (REVENUE DEPTT)
OWP/1902/2017 · 2026-07-03
Rahul Bharti
body1902
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1902 DAILYLAW 1 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 1902 DAILYLAW 1 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 3 Regular List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR OWP No. 1902/2017
Hafeeza Bano …Petitioner(s) Through: None
Vs. State of JK and Ors.
...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, Dy.AG.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE.
ORDER 20.12.2025
01. There has no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last date of hearing and same is the position today as well. It appears that petitioner has lost interest in pursuing this matter.
02. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
04.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE SRINAGAR: 20.12.2025
“Shamim Dar”