Amendment status not verified — confirm the current text below against the official source.
(1) Where any property of a ward is in the possession of any person who has been granted a lease by the ward and dated within the three years immediately preceding the commencement of superintendence of the Court, or of any representative of such lessee, the 52[Collector] may inquire into the sufficiency of the consideration for which the lease was granted; and if the 52[Collector] is of the opinion that the consideration is inadequate, he may, with the previous sanction of the Court, give notice in writing to the lessee that the lease shall determine at the end of the then current revenue year, unless the lessee or his representative pays or agrees to pay such additional consideration specified in such notice within the date therein fixed. If the such person fails to pay or to agree to pay the additional consideration agreed upon by the 52[Collector], the lease shall determine at the end of the then current revenue year. If the lessee or his representative is aggrieved by the said notice or the 52[Collector], he may, within three months from the date of receipt of such notice, institute a suit against the ward, in a competent Court, for determining the following matters:- (a) Whether the consideration for the lease was adequate; (b) If the consideration is found to be inadequate, the consideration which would be reasonable.