Amendment status not verified — confirm the current text below against the official source.
Though the deity being a public one duly managed by a Trust Board. However, the matter is to be decided by the Consolidation Authorities, 104 (2007) CLT 68, 2007 (I) OLR 791, (2007) 1 CLR 766 (Prafulla Chandra Mohapatra Vs. State of Orissa and others) Suit file for specific performance of contract but the compliance of Section 69 not made as such, the suit dismissed as was held to be proper 107 (2009) CLT 210, 2009 (I) CLR 781 (Ram Chandra Sahu Vs. Subhas Kumar Sinha and others) Since the suit filed have got nothing to do with the administration of the temple, the provisions of Section 73 of the Act will not stand on the way of the Civil Court to entertain the suit and as such no notice required to be served on the Commissioner of Endowment, 94 (2002) CLT 755 (Brahman Nijog Vs. Badu Nijog and others)