Bare ActsThe ODISHA HINDU RELIGIOUS ENDOWMENTS ACT, 1951

Section 11

Amendment status not verified — confirm the current text below against the official source.

Onus to establish claim over the Property :– Onus lies on the plaintiff to prove that the mahanta who sold the properties to him was the absolute owner of the property – Inference cannot be drawn from the act or omission of the authorities under the Endowment Act and Collector to confer title of the property on the mahanta as a owner of the properties, 2004 (I) CLR 71, (Madhu Sudan Panda and after him Mukta Devi and others Vs. The Commissioner of Endowment, Orissa and others) Appointment of non-hereditary trustee by the Additional Assistant Commissioner of Endowment. The tenure of the order having been expired operating for more than 1½ yrs. The Hon’ble Court was not inclined to interfere the order, 98 (2004) CLT 221, 2004 (II) OLR 174, 2004 (II) CLR 657 (Dibyakanta Dash Vs. The Commissioner of Endowment, Orissa, Bhubaneswar and others) please also see 2004 (4) CCC 56, 98 (2004) CLT 357, 2004 (II) OLR 229, 2004 (II) CLR 418, (Shri Mahadev Bisi and others Vs. Niranjan Bisi)

Section 11 – The ODISHA HINDU RELIGIOUS ENDOWMENTS ACT, 1951 | DailyLaw.ai