Bare ActsThe Maharashtra Revenue Jurisdiction Act

Section 11

Amendment status not verified — confirm the current text below against the official source.

7[Except as otherwise expressly provided in the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, no Civil Court shall entertain] any suit 3[against the 4[Government]], on account of any act or omission of any Revenue-officer unless the plaintiff first proves that previously to bringing his suit, he has presented all such appeals allowed by the law for the time being in force as, within the period of limitation allowed for bringing such suit, it was possible to present. 1 The words “by the Provincial Government” were substituted for the words “by Government” by the Adaptation of Indian Laws Order in Council. 2 This word was substituted for the word “Provincial” by the Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950. 3 The words “against the Crown” were substituted for the words “against Government” by the Adaptation of Indian Laws Order in Council. 4 This word was substituted for the word “Crown” by the Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950. 5 This paragraph was added by the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction (Amendment) Act, 1877 (16 of 1877). 6 The Bombay Hereditary Officer Act. 7 These words were substituted for the words “No Civil Court shall entertain” by Mah. 41 of 1966, s. 334 (Schedule K). Bar of certain suits against Revenue officers. Punishment or prosecution of Revenue officers no bar to civil remedies. Suits not to be entertained unless plaintiff has exhausted right of appeal. Mah. XLI of

Section 11 – The Maharashtra Revenue Jurisdiction Act | DailyLaw.ai