Amendment status not verified — confirm the current text below against the official source.
Availability of Intra Court appeal and/or Right of appeaJ .• (t is provided in S.2(1) that an appeal shall lie from a judgment or order pas ed by one Judge of the High Court in exerci e of original jurisdiction under Art. 226 of the Constitution to a Division Bench comprising two judges of same High Court. Thus, an Intra Court appeal was all though available only against a judgment and order pa sod by one Judge of the High Court in ex rcise of its original jurisdiction under Art. 226 of the Constitution and not against any judgment or order passed under Art. 226 of the Constitution as uch. The legislative intent behind Clause 10 of the Letters Patent and Section 2 of the Adhiniyam of 2005 wa that if a single Judge of the High Court hears a matter and passes an order, the litigant must have a right of appeal to a Divi ion Bench of the High Court. The right ofapp al, therefore, was not available in every writ petition was heard and decided by one judge of the High Court. Priyank Chansoria v. High Court of M.P.. 2009(4) MPLJ 586 (DB).