Bare ActsThe Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Evam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam 1993

Section 320

[3] Prescribed authority has no jurisQiction to pass order

Amendment status not verified — confirm the current text below against the official source.

[3] Prescribed authority has no jurisQiction to pass order .ofremoval of Sarpanch beyOnd period ofl20 days. Proviso to Section 40(1)(c) is mandatory in nature. 2013(2) JLJ 84 Relied on. Saniosh Raghuvanshi v. State 01'If.P,. 2013(2) MPWN 2B(DB). [4]Complaints, -Complaints against petitionerregardingnon-payme nt of wages to workers is a serious matter. Collector directed to take action againstthepetitioner:Kusuma Yadav v. Stat~ ofM.P., 2013(2) MPWN 109. , ,,[(jUt ,w~~_!,llgg~~t!!-"tSQP.~.u9!ofp~ti,tiQn!,r'~ t>!!~ba'\.~was unla)Vful. Sarpanch!Petitioner could not be dIsqualified on this ground and cannot be removed from the post of Sarpanch. 2012(2) sec 407 Foil. Guddi Devi v. State of M.P., 2013(2) MPWN 117. [6J Removal of office bearer of Panchayat.-Show cause notice re- quired to be issued under the proceedings must reflect the charges on the I I to • , Ie n n •-.,- j e 1 ; I ) I 8.40 PANCHAYAT RAJ AVAM GRAM SWARAJ ADHI., 1993 (PA)87 !- COMMENTARY SYNOPSIS 8.40 .-------. ',.C-- PANCHAYAT RAJ AVAM GRAM SWARAJ ADHI., 1993 (PA)86 ing any pecuniary benefits to any relative, such as giving out any type of lease. getting any work done through them In the Panchayat by an office bearer of Panchayat. Explanation.-For the purpose of this clause the expression 'relatlve' shall mean father. mother. brother, sister, husband. WIfe. Son. daughter. mother-In-law. father-In-law. brother-In-law. slster-In_ law. son-In-law or daughter-In-law:] I[Provided further that the final order In the Inquiry shall be passed WIthin 90 days from the date of issue of'show cause notice to the concerned office bearer and where the pending case Is not decided WIthin 90 days ..the prescribed authOrity shall inform all facts to his next senior officer in Writing and request extension of time for disposal of the inqUiry but such extension of time shall not be more than 30 days.] (2) A person who has been removed under sub-scction (1) shall forthWIth cease to be a member of any other Panchayat of which he is a member, such person shall also be disqualified Ii,,' a period of six years to be elected 2[ x x x J under this Act. I. .Requirements of clause (1))of sub'sect.ion (1).. " _

Section 320 – The Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Evam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam 1993 | DailyLaw.ai