Amendment status not verified — confirm the current text below against the official source.
R4erence of disputes to Trtbunal.-(1) If any question or d1spute arises- (a) between the Board and the previous owner of any street or square or part thereof which has vested m the lloard under section 58 and has been altered or closed by 1t, as to the sufficien<:y of the com- pensation paid or proposed to be paid under sub-section (3) of that M:Ction,or (b) between the Board and any person who was rntitled, other- wise than as a mere member of the-public, to usc as a means of access any street or square or part thereof which has v~:stcd m th Board under section 58- • • 36 (i) as to whether the alteration or clo'>ing of such street, square or part causes damage or substantial inconvemence to owners of property adjacent thereto or to res1dents in the neighbourhood, or (i1) as to whether the other means of access prov1ded or pro- posed to be provided under sub-section ( 4) of the said section 58 are reasonably sufficient, or (ii1) as to the suffic1ency of any compensation pa1d or proposed to be paid under the said sub-:.ect10n (4), or (c) between the Board and any person, as to the sufficiency of any compensation pa1d or proposed to be pa1d to hrm under section 37, 40, 41, 43, 64, 65 or 157, the matter shall be determined by the Tribunal if referred to 1t either by the Board or by the claimant, within a period of three months from- m case (a) or ca~e (b)-the date on wh1ch the street or ::.quare or part thereof was altered or closed by the Board, and --' m case (c)-the date on which the said person was mformed of the decis1on of the Board fixmg the amount of compensation to be paid to hrm or rejectmg h1s claim to compensation; and the determination of the Tribunal shall be final. (2) If a reference to the Tribunal be not made within the period prescribed by sub-section (I), the decision of the Board shall be final. (3) For the purpose of determmmg any matter referred to it under sub-section (1), the Tnbunal shall have all the powers with regard to Witnesses, documents and costs wh1ch it would have if the Land AcqulSltion Act (Travancore. Act XI of 1089), as modified by section 73 of th1s Act, were apphcable to the case.