Amendment status not verified — confirm the current text below against the official source.
Repeal of Karnataka Ordinance No. 4 of 1962. * * * * STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND REASONS I Act 35 of 1962.- At present the Home Guards Organisation is in existence only in the Bombay-Karnataka Districts of the State. In view of the present emergency it is considered necessary to have a voluntary body of persons throughout the State to discharge duties in relation to the protection of persons, the security of property and preservation of public order in emergency. Hence, it is proposed to organise Home Guards in the entire State. In order to effectively control and administer the Organisation it is necessary to have a uniform law. In view of the urgency and as 1962: KAR. ACT 35] Home Guards 811 the Legislature was not in session, the Mysore Home Guards Ordinance, 1962, was issued. The present Bill is intended to replace the said ordinance. Except for the two clauses relating to repeal and savings, and the addition of a provision for laying rules made under the Act before the Houses of Legislature, in other respects the provisions of the Bill are identical with the provisions of the Ordinance. (Published in the Karnataka Gazette (Extraordinary) Part IV-2A, dated 1st December 1962 as No. 238 at page. 8.) II Amending Act 11 of 1977.—Karnataka State Home Guards is a statutory organization in the State and the services of Home Guards have become indispensable and decisive in maintaining peace and tranquility at elections, Railway Strikes and Political and Labour Demonstrations. The Members of Home Guards, excepting a few full time paid Officers, are all Volunteers employed in Private and Public Undertakings. The Home Guards belong to different traders, professions such as Doctors, Lawyers, Educationists, Engineers, Businessmen, Central and State Government Servants and Farmers. When such members are called on duty in emergent situations either to maintain public peace and order or to safeguard public property, difficulty is experienced to call them on duty because the Employers do not treat their absence as on duty. Consequently, the Employees will have to face loss of wages, salary etc., for the period they remain absent. In some cases when such persons respond to the call serve, as Home Guards even Departmental Proceedings were instituted against them for their absence from duty. There is no provision in the Home Guards Act, 1962 (Karnataka Act 35 of 1962), providing protection against such contingencies to the Home Guards. Therefore, with a view to protect the employees reporting themselves to the call-up from loss of salary, wages, etc., it is felt necessary that a provision be made to make it obligatory on the part of Employers to treat the period of absence at their offices while on Home Guards duty to pay their pay and allowance they are entitled to, at the place of employment, as if they are on duty. Since the Karnataka Legislature was not in session the Karnataka Home Guards (Amendment) Ordinance, 1977 was promulgated. This Bill Seeks to replace the said Ordinance. (Published in the Karnataka Gazette (Extraordinary) Part IV-2A, dated 26th March 1977 as No. 235 at page. 4.) Home Guards [1962: KAR. ACT 35 812 III Amending Act 19 of 2003.— It is considered necessary to amend the Karnataka Home Guards Act, 1962 (Karnataka Act 35 of 1962) to provide for,- (i) the procedure for selection and appointment of Commandants of Home Guards; (ii) qualification, conditions of service and the term of office of the Commandant of Home Guards. Consequential amendments are also proposed. Hence the Bill. [LA Bill No.1 of 2003] [Entry 1 and 2 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India] IV Amending Act 20 of 2011.— It is considered necessary to amend the Karnataka Home Guards Act, 1962 to provide for extension of office of the Commandant for a period of five years and further period of two terms five years each and fixing the maximum age limits to the post of Commandants. Hence the Bill. [LA Bill No.16 of 2011, File No. Samvyashae 37 Shasana 2010] [Entries 1 and 2 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India] V Amending Act 30 of 2014.- It is considered necessary to amend the Karnataka Home Guards Act, 1962 (Karnataka Act No.35 of 1962) in order to reconstitute the Committee constituted for the purpose of appointment of the commandants under Sub-Section (2A) of Section 3 of the said Act. Hence, the Bill. [L.A. Bill No. 45 of 2014, File No. Samvyashae 09 Shasana 2012] [entry 5 and 41 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India.] * * * * 1962: KAR. ACT 35] Home Guards 813 1 [KARNATAKA ACT] 1 No. 35 OF 1962 (First published in the 1 [Karnataka Gazette] 1 on the Twenty-seventh day of December, 1962.) THE 1 [KARNATAKA] 1 HOME GUARDS ACT, 1962. (Received the assent of the Governor on the Eighteenth day of December, 1962.) (As Amended by Karnataka Act 11 of 1977, 19 of 2003, 20 of 2011 and 30 of 2014) An Act to provide for the constitution of Home Guards in the 1 [State of Karnataka] 1 . WHEREAS it is expedient to provide a volunteer organization for use in emergencies and for other purposes in the 1 [State of Karnataka] 1 ; BE it enacted by the 1 [Karnataka State] 1 Legislature in the Thirteenth Year of the Republic of India as follows:—