Bare ActsThe Karnataka Civil Services (Validation of Selection and appointment of 2011 batch Gazettedprobationers) Act, 2022.

Section 55

Resultantly, these writ petitions eminently deserve to be allowed and accordingly: a) Writ Petitions No

Amendment status not verified — confirm the current text below against the official source.

Resultantly, these writ petitions eminently deserve to be allowed and accordingly: a) Writ Petitions No. 13617-13627/2017 & 14529/2017 and writ Petition No. 11342/2017 are allowed; b) Common order dated 19.10.2016 passed by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, Bangalore, in Applications No. 6268/2014, 6395/2017 c/w 6432/2014 to 6444/2014 &6598/2014, 7464/2014, 7941/2014 to 7946/2014, 7950/2014 to 7966/2014, 7967/2014, 7968/2014, 7969/2014, 9112/2014 to 9126/2014, 9592/2014 to 9610/2014 and 8298/2015, is quashed. c) Un-official Note, C£À¢üPÀÈvÀ n¥Ààt ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 139 ¸ÉÃ¯ÉÆÃ¸Éà 2016 dated 17.03.2017, issued by Deputy Secretary, DPAR (Services), Government of Karnataka, is quashed; d) Official Memorandum, C¢üPÀÈvÀ eÁÕ¥À£À ¸ÀASÉå: 19457 rJAJ 32 PÉJAJJ¸ï 2016-17 dated 27.03.2017, issued by Director, Municipal Administration, Bengaluru, is quashed; e) All orders of appointment/s issued pursuant to FInal Select List dated 21.03.2014 prepared by KPSC are declared illegal and shall stand quashed; and f) Government Order, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 53 ¸ÉÃ¯ÉÆÃ¸Éà 2014, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, dated 14.08.2014, withdrawing requisitions issued to KPSC for selection of Gazetted Probationers for 2011, and to close selection process, is sustained. “56. In view of disposal of these writ petitions, I.A.No. 16/2017 (in W.Ps. No. 13617-13627/2017 & 14529/2017) for impleadment, filed by the applicants claiming to be candidates in 2011 selection, does not survive for consideration and is accordingly disposed of.” In I.A.No. 4/2018 in Writ Petitions No. 13617-13627/2017Renukambike R and Others Vs State The Hon‟ble High Court in Division bench has held on 13th July 2018 as follows; “30. For the reasons recorded above, we answer the point No. (i) in the affirmative and record our finding that results of written examination are vitiated.” Re-Point (ii): Whether fresh viva voce can be ordered, if the evaluation of answer scripts are not vitiated?

Section 55 – The Karnataka Civil Services (Validation of Selection and appointment of 2011 batch Gazettedprobationers) Act, 2022. | DailyLaw.ai