Amendment status not verified — confirm the current text below against the official source.
Rostrricviori ov rower of a local auihority to ma~ic: rules, regulations or kllf«-1:=iws h, respect of certain matteil's.- Notwithstanding· anything con- tamed in any law for the time being in force, no rule, regulation or bye-law which :s inconsistent with any provision of tho Act or any ·uie or regulation made un- • • :. -•--11 '--~ -·~·~1;~ .. htc ,.,;+hin vhr., ::m,;:i nolifind under sub-section (2) of Section [No prosecution for any offence punishable under this Act shall '1e inst: tuted except Wl"1 ihe previous sanction ot th8 authority or the Chairman or any otner omcer at !-oriLe• ' by !lie autt xity or the Chairman on its behalf Any pros- ecuiion launchc wrthout sanction is noi maintainable dnd the judgment and the sanction ii pas eo is ii lo. I )e s qs1de Mohan Thekur vs. The Stetc of Bihm 1999 (3) PLJn 388 . .Sections 80 and 81 -fb:ing of pay scales of the employees of the Author- ity =-contro! of State Government over the Authoriiy-wide and pervasive and ·t wiH be difficult for Authority to take independent decision contrary to the dcci- slon and directions of the Government -however, in 'lhe matter of 11J(mg the pay scale. the Acl vest power in the Authority to make requlation-> there is no re- striction or. t.10 oxercise of this reou!aiion making power oxcopt that the rer.Jula· tions must bo consistent with tho Act and the rules 'made thereunder-if the statute vests power in the Authority lo frame sucn regulations then merely because par; o its fund comprise of grdnts etc. from !he Governmen:, would not make it dependent on Government so as ·10 bouno by its directive regarding pay scale. Prnmod Kumar Singh vs. PR.DA., 2002 (4} :->LJR, 616.] 7!.I:.. Prol,~ci:ion 01 action taken in gooC!l 1aith.-No suit, prosecution, or other legal proceeding shall lie against any person to anything which is in good f,:.!1h done or intended 10 be done under this Ac1 or any rule or regulation made thereunder, ; Seen 7 4- Ii 8itnr Regional Development. Authority Ac., 1974 4 S 1