Amendment status not verified — confirm the current text below against the official source.
An exemption from 1igherasses.-sn.eut not bf.f, ,r, .. ·x· ,, in~ L ':-qir~ly creat~ in favour of A by enactment, aud he may f.!1.;ek rolitrf in thu Civil Court agi~ir1ot over-assessment • (2} It is enactod that, when a specific limit to nssesm1c•nt has bc·en cstn.hfo•hcd and prcsorvod, the as::.ui-.smout shn.11 not cxc00<l 1:moh spocific limit. A is tho ownor of laud worth Rs. 100 for u.sst>.SS~f.·nt .. Ha ~lu.ims to. lie assc&>ed at RE!. 50 only on thu str"'ngth of a course of dealing with him aud his pI'(,'<ic<;t,sson; llliuur wluth 1 The woz'(h "Provincial Government" were aub.qtituted forthev.·ortlli "Governor of BCJJllba:Yill Council" by the Alla.ptatiou of Indian Lav.s Oidcr in Council. • S Thi1t word was eubstitut.ed for the v.ord "Prm mci1tl" by tbt- .Adnrtatior1 of La'I>~ Ouln 19(;0 3 Clauee (ii ) wa. i.neerted by Bom. 41' of 1%9. s. 4 (ir)(a). ' • ~ rno H<>rdi .. H lyerabad, ~a1lhya PrAJesh •. were deleted by the Gujarat Adaptati<1n of Law (Siate and Concurrent Subj<>ots) Order. l 91JO. • 6 The11e 'll'Orda were aubl<f.ituted for the wc,r.ii; "Slate of Bon:ba) ", ifid. 6 Bom. 4of1868, Bom.l of 1806 (e'XCopL s~. :'l7 and 38), a1.ol Br.m. Rei;e.17 of 1$27 are rcpealrcl by lh.e Bombay Land Riwenu" Code, 1879 (1lom. V •>f 1870). in 1trN111 m "loirl tl•1· lat,j<'t A.ct foin Curi·e Ss. 37 and 38 of Born. l ofl865 are repealed so far u th11.v apply to .AD) ,-i.llage Jn the RauiaS(lti or ih~ Kola.ha Datriot1 to which the Khoti Settlement Act, 1850 ( B1•m. l of l f~l•), ('l.kud• or Ii extendllCI. 7 Bombav R"'nt-free Eatates Act. 1Sll2. I n ... Words were illlened by Bom. 48 of 1969, •· 4(it1)(6). 124 Bombay Ret•enue Jmisdiction Act, 1876 [1876 : Act. X his 11\nd hns not boon morn liighly aSEofi~Nl. Thorn is no ex('mption not before exi:;ting creatod by onn.clm•·ur, and A's <:l<'l.iru is not cognizable in a Civil Court. (3) It is ennotud that luutl rev\·nui• shnll not bo leviable from uny land held Mid tiatvrod iH tha laucl-1"l.tgi .... h·1~ us ·~.xt•mr.t. A claims to hold certain land as o.x.tiinp1 on tho ~rround t.lu1t it has b<hlu s" hehl by him, aud is so l·ntorcd in the fand-r<:gist\ r. Thi::. is an f•xomptiun t•xpressly confirmed by (·nactmont on the ground uf it!! bning shown iu u. public record, a.nd A '1:1 clo.im is coguizaLlu in a Civil Cuurt. (4) It is Pna.uted that tho C1Jl!octor ~.hall conlirm exist mg (•Xemp1 ions of rul lanus shown iu certain mups to be ex• mpt. .11 cli.ims <>xemption, alleging that hiA land is tihowu iu tho maps to b11 t'Xempt. A 'a claim is coguizablo in a Civil Court. (.5) It is 011r.cteu that at1ses~mcut sLall be fixed with referenco to c~rtain con- :;id1·mticms and n.01 with reforonce to 01 };eri;. This is not an e11u.ctmant crt1ating an ex1.1mptio1i in favvur of any individu1tl or class, ••nd no ohjeotion to an asst\68- mont uuder sud1 im ouactment is cognizable in a Ci\iil Court. Bav~ of