Amendment status not verified — confirm the current text below against the official source.
Rer~ declaration may be made under section 6 in respect ofthe land at any time I{ after the date of (I) / the publication ofthe notification) under section 4, sub-section (I). to Ihe Col COMMENTS the court, compcnsa The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Shri Bala Ganeshan Metals v. M.N. Shanmugham Chetty. among lhc AIR 1987 SC 1668, 1987(2) SCC 707, 1987(2) JT 247, 1987( I) Scale 1110, 1987(1) Cu,. CC 1054, while dealing with the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Control) Act, 1960. (2) • observed that it was settled rule of interpretation that the provisions of the Act should be Provi interpreted in soch a manner as not to tender any ofthe provisions of those unless there was compelling reasons for the coun to adopt extreme contingency, Section 17(3A) postulates that the owner will 6e offered an amount equivalent to 80 per cent ofestimated compensation for the land before the Government take possession under Section 17(1). Where 80 per cent was not paid although it is so required under Section 17(3A) that it should have been made before the possession is taken. The contention that compensation could be paid under Section 5 not accepted.- Surinder Prasad Jain v. State o/U.P. /993(5) JT 385: J991(4) see 369. I. Ina. by Act 68 or 1984. w.e.L 2....9-19&4. 1 Word