Amendment status not verified — confirm the current text below against the official source.
1 bis Act was enact, .!d \\ ith the purpose to a void superfluity anti repetition of la nguages, and s' t10rten language used 10 parllameotary legis l <~ tion . 'J his Act is not meap_.t to give a hide-bound meaning to terms and phrases generally occurr- i;,,g 10 legislation [N. Subramania v. Official Receiver, AlR J95R SC 1). This Act can apply for the interpretation of the Constttution ns it a pplies for the interpretation o r an Act. [Ram Ki3hore v. Union of India, AIR 1966 SC 644] .